EVEMISSLAB
English

實驗EXP-2026-0002v0.1

R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較

兩個事實(一穩定、一在第 8 與 16 小時改變),17 個模擬小時內 8 次查詢。B1 無狀態每次重算;B2 固定 6 小時 TTL;B3 加 workflow 記憶;B4 是帶事件驅動失效的複合 agent。AER-0 在零過期回答、零穩定節點刷新與 workflow 重用上與 B4 打平,因為張力政策主動刷新而多一次重算(3 vs 2),但只有它擋下無 provenance 的事實並抓到衝突寫入。

研究狀態
STABLE 目前的研究結論相對穩定
證據等級
E2 受控實驗
結果
MIXED
資料基礎
DETERMINISTIC RUNTIME 在真實 runtime 裡執行的決定性情境;程式碼與做法都列出,數字是什麼就是什麼。
版本
0.1
更新
2026-09-08
建立
2026-09-08
領域
AI Architecture, Evaluation, Agent Systems
計畫
PRG-2026-0001 自適應世界狀態系統的第一原理框架
作者
Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI 協作
Sol (GPT-5.6, OpenAI ChatGPT)

假設

hypothesis
AER's different ownership and update semantics survive into observable runtime behaviour when compared with progressively stronger baselines.

設定

software_environment
Python 3.11+, SQLite; no network, no external database, no LLM API required.

執行

run_count
1
controls
  • B4 deliberately stronger than B3 so ordinary event invalidation and external memory are not attributed to AER.
metrics
verdict
AER_DISTINCT_ON_TESTED_SEMANTICS
table
B1_stateless
stale
0
recomputation
8
stable_refresh
0
volatile_refresh
0
workflow_reuse
0
model_swap_preserves_state
false
blocks_no_provenance
false
catches_conflict
false
B2_fixed_ttl
stale
2
recomputation
4
stable_refresh
2
volatile_refresh
2
workflow_reuse
0
model_swap_preserves_state
true
blocks_no_provenance
false
catches_conflict
false
B3_memory_tools
stale
2
recomputation
4
stable_refresh
2
volatile_refresh
2
workflow_reuse
6
model_swap_preserves_state
true
blocks_no_provenance
false
catches_conflict
false
B4_evented_agent
stale
0
recomputation
2
stable_refresh
0
volatile_refresh
2
workflow_reuse
6
model_swap_preserves_state
true
blocks_no_provenance
false
catches_conflict
false
AER-0
stale
0
recomputation
3
stable_refresh
0
volatile_refresh
3
workflow_reuse
6
model_swap_preserves_state
true
blocks_no_provenance
true
catches_conflict
true

詮釋

interpretation
Not a dominance result. Persistent memory across model swap, workflow reuse and selective event-driven refresh are not unique to AER once the baseline is strengthened; the measured difference collapses to state-mutation semantics (provenance gate, optimistic version conflict, candidate/verify/commit authority).

限制

limitations
  • B4 is a reference implementation of event-driven behaviour, not a real production framework (structural closure PARTIAL).
  • Says nothing about intelligence, speed, cost in other environments, or whether an attractor exists.

重現

reproduction_instructions
Extract the round's FINAL bundle; python -m pytest -q; python -m examples.research_assistant_demo; python -m benchmarks.<round benchmark>. Checksums in SHA256SUMS.txt.

結果

來源關係目標狀態ID
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較producesRST-2026-0001 R1 比較表ACTIVEREL-2026-0112

記錄欄位

completed_at
2026-09-08

關係

來源關係目標狀態ID
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較runs_onSYS-2026-0001 AER-0——自適應認識 runtime MVPACTIVEREL-2026-0105
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較uses_benchmarkBEN-2026-0002 AER-0 架構比較套件(R1–R6)ACTIVEREL-2026-0106
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較testsTHY-2026-0001 非對稱時空張力:時間異質的世界知識ACTIVEREL-2026-0107
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較testsTHY-2026-0002 Canonical 符號狀態與 candidate → verify → commit 權限ACTIVEREL-2026-0108
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較testsTHY-2026-0003 智能架構吸引子ACTIVEREL-2026-0109
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較extendsEXP-2026-0001 AER-0 MVP v0.1 收束:不變量能不能被執行?ACTIVEREL-2026-0110
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較producedART-2026-0015 AER-0 MVP v0.1 Architecture Comparison R1 artifact://evemisslab/adaptive-epistemic-systems/AER-0_MVP_v0.1_Architecture_Comparison_R1.zipACTIVEREL-2026-0111
EXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較producesRST-2026-0001 R1 比較表ACTIVEREL-2026-0112
EXP-2026-0003 R2——對 LangGraph 1.2.11 的 source-grounded 結構比較extendsEXP-2026-0002 R1——對四個基線的決定性語義比較ACTIVEREL-2026-0121

歷史與來源歷程

Canonical URL
https://evemisslab.com/ai/experiments/EXP-2026-0002/
機器可讀
/ai/experiments/EXP-2026-0002/index.json
快照
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45
來源歷程
source
EveMissLab research collection: Adaptive Epistemic Systems (真本體論13)
extracted_by
Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each lab's own result reports
extracted_at
2026-09-11
generator
tools/extract_aes/extract.py
claim_boundary
status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports