EVEMISSLAB

English

論文PAP-2026-0106v0.1

成果品質到底怎麼量？：從形式化正確性到結構化智能品質

把品質變成關係 Q(Y | 任務、規格、環境、邊界)，以三層（形式化、結構化、人類殘餘）結構化向量量測，附 hard gate、三向覆蓋率、mutation 測出的測試強度、規格—驗證分離與 E–A+ 品質證據階梯；效率不進品質，除非規格把它放進去。

研究狀態: STABLE 目前的研究結論相對穩定
證據等級: E0 僅有概念
資料基礎: THEORY 純理論推理，沒有量測。
版本: 0.1
更新: 2026-09-02
建立: 2026-09-02
領域: Evaluation
計畫: PRG-2026-0101 智能的物理計量（IPM）
作者: Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI 協作: Aletheia (GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI ChatGPT)

紀錄

publication_type: series paper (Intelligence Physical Metrology series, 10 papers); 公開純理論論文, 無 MVP
authors: Neo.K (EveMissLab)
date: 2026-09-02
doi_or_external_id: EML-IPM-06
source_artifact: IPM_06_成果品質到底怎麼量_v0.1.zip!/IPM_06_成果品質到底怎麼量_從形式化正確性到結構化智能品質_v0.1.md

記錄欄位

checksums

paper .md sha256: 25947f12ebfcff20aef144435dae50f9ffda1cccfdb143e319f8b2a6918356b8

tags

zh-TW
canonical UTF-8 Markdown
paper 6/10
role: 客觀與結構化品質

關係

來源	關係	目標	狀態	ID
`PAP-2026-0106` 成果品質到底怎麼量？：從形式化正確性到結構化智能品質	`reports`	`RES-2026-0102` 品質線——不叫人打分數也能量成果品質	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0411`
`PAP-2026-0106` 成果品質到底怎麼量？：從形式化正確性到結構化智能品質	`formalizes`	`THY-2026-0106` 結構化品質、hard gate 與規格—驗證分離	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0412`
`PAP-2026-0106` 成果品質到底怎麼量？：從形式化正確性到結構化智能品質	`packaged_as`	`ART-2026-0107` EML-IPM Paper 06 — canonical UTF-8 Markdown + manifest (zip) `artifact://evemisslab/intelligence-physical-metrology/IPM_06_成果品質到底怎麼量_v0.1.zip`	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0413`
`PAP-2026-0106` 成果品質到底怎麼量？：從形式化正確性到結構化智能品質	`packaged_as`	`ART-2026-0101` EML-IPM v0.1 canonical series package — 10 papers + canonical index + SHA-256 manifest (UTF-8 Markdown) `artifact://evemisslab/intelligence-physical-metrology/IPM_v0.1_Canonical_Series_Package.zip`	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0414`

歷史與來源歷程

Canonical URL

https://evemisslab.com/ai/papers/PAP-2026-0106/

機器可讀

/ai/papers/PAP-2026-0106/index.json

快照

AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45

來源歷程

source: EveMissLab research collection: Intelligence Physical Metrology (真本體論13)
extracted_by: Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each package's own reports
extracted_at: 2026-09-11
generator: tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary: status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports