理論THY-2026-0004v0.1
概率不等於貝葉斯;貝葉斯不能自我授權前提
一個系統可以是隨機的、概率的或概率形狀的,卻沒有做 Bayesian conditionalization;也可以看起來像 Bayesian,卻沒有真正的 prior、likelihood 或 posterior。一套分層詞彙(stochastic、probabilistic、Bayesian-like、exact、approximate、generalized Bayesian)與「Bayesian authenticity test」檢查一次更新是實質 Bayesian 還是事後被重新描述成 Bayesian;而更新規則本身——prior、likelihood、假設空間——需要一個 Bayes 公式給不出的授權(第 9–10 篇)。
主張
claims- 'This is a probabilistic system' and 'this is a Bayesian system' are not equivalent statements.
- Bayesian updating is one belief-revision operator among several; the epistemic router should choose the operator explicitly and record its provenance.
預測
predictions- An adaptive epistemic router beats AlwaysBayes, AlwaysLogic and AlwaysRobust across mixed domains only if operator choice is explicit and traced (Paper 11 §86).
證偽/失敗條件
falsification_conditions- Fixed Bayesian updating dominates every mixed-domain test at equal cost.
已知限制
known_limitations- Formal/conceptual so far; the AER-0 router implements four operators but no mixed-domain routing benchmark has been run.
關係
| 來源 | 關係 | 目標 | 狀態 | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RES-2026-0001 自適應認識系統的盲推導 | develops | THY-2026-0004 概率不等於貝葉斯;貝葉斯不能自我授權前提 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0013 |
RES-2026-0002 PACC 猜想——非概率 primitive 會不會收斂到概率表象? | develops | THY-2026-0004 概率不等於貝葉斯;貝葉斯不能自我授權前提 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0014 |
PAP-2026-0009 概率不等於貝葉斯——從隨機系統、概率模型到 Bayesian 更新的認識論邊界 | formalizes | THY-2026-0004 概率不等於貝葉斯;貝葉斯不能自我授權前提 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0042 |
PAP-2026-0010 貝葉斯中的貝葉斯——誰授權更新規則?從 Prior、Likelihood 到 Meta-Epistemology 的遞歸問題 | formalizes | THY-2026-0004 概率不等於貝葉斯;貝葉斯不能自我授權前提 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0045 |
歷史與來源歷程
- Canonical URL
- https://evemisslab.com/ai/theory/THY-2026-0004/
- 快照
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45- 來源歷程
source- EveMissLab research collection: Adaptive Epistemic Systems (真本體論13)
extracted_by- Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each lab's own result reports
extracted_at- 2026-09-11
generator- tools/extract_aes/extract.py
claim_boundary- status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports