理論THY-2026-0202v0.1
綠燈謬誤
除非全域後置條件 G 被映射進它們的覆蓋範圍,否則 V₁(x) ∧ … ∧ Vₙ(x) = PASS 推不出 G(x) = PASS。讀同一來源或共用生成 oracle 的檢查彼此不獨立;範圍偽 PASS 是正確的 detector 指向錯誤的表面;NOT MEASURED 是一個結果,永遠不是通過。
形式化
formalization- V₁ ∧ … ∧ Vₙ = PASS ⇏ G = PASS
- claimed assurance ≤ demonstrated coverage
記錄欄位
tags- paper 01
關係
| 來源 | 關係 | 目標 | 狀態 | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
THY-2026-0202 綠燈謬誤 | contains | CLM-2026-0203 H3——共用證據根的多個 AI 審查者,高估了驗證的獨立性 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0514 |
RES-2026-0201 為什麼通過檢查,不等於守住公開邊界 | develops | THY-2026-0202 綠燈謬誤 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0505 |
PAP-2026-0202 論文 01——綠燈謬誤:代理驗證成功與真實安全後置條件的落差 | formalizes | THY-2026-0202 綠燈謬誤 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0529 |
歷史與來源歷程
- Canonical URL
- https://evemisslab.com/ai/theory/THY-2026-0202/
- 快照
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-58e716495670- 來源歷程
source- EveMissLab research collection: AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (真本體論14)
extracted_by- Splice (Claude Code), reading the open-source release's own manifests, locks and pooled outputs, and the hashes of the internal drafts
extracted_at- 2026-10-13
generator- tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary- status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports