EVEMISSLAB

ClaimCLM-2026-0103v0.1

F3 — Binary burden hypothesis

If direct numeric human rating were already the minimum-burden, high-quality measurement interface, then well-designed binary / pairwise adaptive protocols should have no advantage in response time, consistency, dropout, predictive validity or fatigue. BRQM predicts an advantage in at least some settings; it can be tested by randomizing participants across direct 0–10, structured yes/no and adaptive pairwise formats.

Research status
PRELIMINARY a first formalisation or observation exists
Evidence level
E0 Concept only
Data basis
THEORY Theoretical reasoning only; no measurement.
Version
0.1
Updated
2026-09-02
Created
2026-09-02
Domain
Evaluation
Program
PRG-2026-0101 Intelligence Physical Metrology (IPM)
Authors
Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI collaborators
Aletheia (GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI ChatGPT)

Recorded fields

falsification_conditions
  • Falsified if binary/pairwise protocols are worse than direct rating on all of response time, consistency, dropout and predictive validity; supported if they win on some.
tags
  • falsifiable proposition
  • IPM v0.1 canonical index §23
  • Paper 10

Relations

SourceRelationTargetStatusID
CLM-2026-0103 F3 — Binary burden hypothesisbelongs_toRES-2026-0102 Quality line — measuring outcome quality without asking humans for a scoreACTIVEREL-2026-0384
THY-2026-0110 The canonical intelligence event, Pareto comparison and no premature scalarizationcontainsCLM-2026-0103 F3 — Binary burden hypothesisACTIVEREL-2026-0385
PAP-2026-0111 IPM v0.1 canonical index — series overview, unified notation and the v0.2 experimental entry pointformalizesCLM-2026-0103 F3 — Binary burden hypothesisACTIVEREL-2026-0439
PAP-2026-0110 Paper 10 — How much physical world does an answer cost? A unified metrology framework for intelligence yieldformalizesCLM-2026-0103 F3 — Binary burden hypothesisACTIVEREL-2026-0440
EXP-2026-0104 Experiment B — binary vs numeric human measurement (declared)testsCLM-2026-0103 F3 — Binary burden hypothesisACTIVEREL-2026-0492

History and provenance

Canonical URL
https://evemisslab.com/ai/claims/CLM-2026-0103/
Machine-readable
/ai/claims/CLM-2026-0103/index.json
Snapshot
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45
Provenance
source
EveMissLab research collection: Intelligence Physical Metrology (真本體論13)
extracted_by
Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each package's own reports
extracted_at
2026-09-11
generator
tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary
status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports