ResultRST-2026-0004v0.1

R5 ten-scenario tally

5 PREVENTED / 3 OPEN_DETECTED / 1 OPEN_UNDETECTED / 1 SERIALIZED_TO_SEMANTIC_CONFLICT; the undetected case is the coherent full-database forgery.

Research status: STABLE the current conclusions are relatively stable
Evidence level: E2 Controlled experiment
Result: MIXED
Data basis: DETERMINISTIC RUNTIME A deterministic scenario executed in a real runtime; the code and procedure are listed, and the numbers are what they are.
Version: 0.1
Updated: 2026-09-08
Created: 2026-09-08
Domain: Evaluation
Program: PRG-2026-0001 Adaptive Epistemic Systems
Authors: Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI collaborators: Sol (GPT-5.6, OpenAI ChatGPT)

Observed result

metrics

interpretation: No external trust anchor ⇒ no full-DB tamperproof claim — a structural result that defines R6.

limitations: Retained negative witnesses are part of the verdict, not implementation accidents.

Source	Relation	Target	Status	ID
`RST-2026-0004` R5 ten-scenario tally	`supports`	`THY-2026-0006` AER-ECT: a mandatory epistemic commit transaction boundary	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0148`

Source	Relation	Target	Status	ID
`RST-2026-0004` R5 ten-scenario tally	`supports`	`THY-2026-0006` AER-ECT: a mandatory epistemic commit transaction boundary	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0148`
`EXP-2026-0006` R5 — complete mediation and bypass resistance	`produces`	`RST-2026-0004` R5 ten-scenario tally	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0147`

Canonical URL

Machine-readable

Snapshot

AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45

Provenance

source: EveMissLab research collection: Adaptive Epistemic Systems (真本體論13)
extracted_by: Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each lab's own result reports
extracted_at: 2026-09-11
generator: tools/extract_aes/extract.py
claim_boundary: status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports