EVEMISSLAB

ResultRST-2026-0205v0.1

Registered prediction not supported: people using three or more AI tools do not leak more

P1 suggested that repositories with three or more detected AI tool families publish local files and high-warning content more often. Written down before P2 was opened; P2 reversed it.

Research status
STABLE the current conclusions are relatively stable
Evidence level
E2 Controlled experiment
Result
NEGATIVE
Data basis
BLIND PUBLIC DATA Real public files measured by an algorithm inside a sealed process. No person and no AI model read them; only coded features left the process. The numbers may be distorted.
Version
0.1
Updated
2026-10-13
Created
2026-10-13
Domain
Privacy
Program
PRG-2026-0201 AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (APBSC)
Authors
Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI collaborators
Splice (Claude Code, Anthropic) — Phase II protocols, runners, audits, reports and the integrated edition

Observed result

metrics
by_marker_family_count
1
repositories
228
any_high
22
local_file
2
2
repositories
88
any_high
6
local_file
4
3+
repositories
84
any_high
6
local_file
5

Interpretation

interpretation
Single-round patterns are noise until they survive a round they did not come from.

Limitations

limitations
  • Exploratory, non-probability frame; not a prevalence estimate.
  • No human checked any finding; secret-like means a shape and was never tested.
  • Current public state only, observed once.

Relations

SourceRelationTargetStatusID
EXP-2026-0203 Rounds P1–P2 — individuals with AI-collaboration markers (400 repositories, 2026-10-13)producesRST-2026-0205 Registered prediction not supported: people using three or more AI tools do not leak moreACTIVEREL-2026-0617

History and provenance

Canonical URL
https://evemisslab.com/ai/results/RST-2026-0205/
Machine-readable
/ai/results/RST-2026-0205/index.json
Snapshot
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-58e716495670
Provenance
source
EveMissLab research collection: AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (真本體論14)
extracted_by
Splice (Claude Code), reading the open-source release's own manifests, locks and pooled outputs, and the hashes of the internal drafts
extracted_at
2026-10-13
generator
tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary
status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports