TheoryTHY-2026-0003v0.1
Intelligent architecture attractor
Different first principles may compile into the same small family of computational forms. The comparison framework separates six levels of difference — code, primitive, computation trace, architectural state semantics, observable behaviour, resource efficiency — and asks who owns state, what may rewrite canonical state, and whether dynamics are preserved under low-cost mapping. The series ends with a fixed verdict map: Distinct Advantage, Operational Convergence, Behavioral Equivalence Only, Inconclusive, Architecture Worse.
Assumptions
assumptions- The executed architecture is the architecture (runtime-truth principle); spec cannot defend runtime.
Claims
claims- Theory difference matters only insofar as it survives into measurable state, computation, behaviour or resource use; if it does not survive, the convergence itself becomes the phenomenon to explain.
- If every possible outcome is interpreted as confirmation, the theory has explained nothing.
Predictions
predictions- Independent architectures' ablation cores intersect (an attractor core) if the attractor is real.
Falsification / failure conditions
falsification_conditions- Distinct Advantage: stable multidimensional advantage over baselines across models, seeds, tasks and horizons weakens the convergence suspicion.
- Architecture Worse: added structure is operationally unnecessary or harmful.
Known limitations
known_limitations- One implementation provides at most candidate evidence for convergence; an attractor study needs n ≫ 2 independent starting points (Paper 11 §53).
Evidence
| Source | Relation | Target | Status | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP-2026-0002 R1 — deterministic semantics comparison against four baselines | tests | THY-2026-0003 Intelligent architecture attractor | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0109 |
RST-2026-0001 R1 comparison table | supports | THY-2026-0003 Intelligent architecture attractor | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0114 |
EXP-2026-0003 R2 — source-grounded structural comparison with LangGraph 1.2.11 | tests | THY-2026-0003 Intelligent architecture attractor | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0118 |
RST-2026-0002 R2 classification matrix | supports | THY-2026-0003 Intelligent architecture attractor | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0124 |
EXP-2026-0004 R3 — epistemic commit transaction vs scattered and centralized application gates | tests | THY-2026-0003 Intelligent architecture attractor | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0131 |
RST-2026-0003 R3: AER-ECT ≈ centralized application gate | supports | THY-2026-0003 Intelligent architecture attractor | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0135 |
Relations
History and provenance
- Canonical URL
- https://evemisslab.com/ai/theory/THY-2026-0003/
- Machine-readable
/ai/theory/THY-2026-0003/index.json- Snapshot
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45- Provenance
source- EveMissLab research collection: Adaptive Epistemic Systems (真本體論13)
extracted_by- Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each lab's own result reports
extracted_at- 2026-09-11
generator- tools/extract_aes/extract.py
claim_boundary- status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports