主張CLM-2026-0204v0.1
H4——傳統 secret scanning 的統計,低估了語義層的隱私外洩
傳統 secret scanning 的統計,低估了語義層的隱私外洩。
記錄欄位
falsification_conditions- Falsified if semantic classes add little beyond literal secret matches. Phase II: the individual-era rule found twice as many repositories with a high warning as the pattern-heavy organization-era rule — suggestive, not a test against real secret scanners.
tags- hypothesis (H)
- integrated edition appendix A
關係
| 來源 | 關係 | 目標 | 狀態 | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
THY-2026-0204 從 secret scanning 到語義隱私 | contains | CLM-2026-0204 H4——傳統 secret scanning 的統計,低估了語義層的隱私外洩 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0515 |
RST-2026-0204 個人時期規則找到的高警示倉庫約為企業時期規則的兩倍(400 個中 34 對 17) | supports | CLM-2026-0204 H4——傳統 secret scanning 的統計,低估了語義層的隱私外洩 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0616 |
歷史與來源歷程
- Canonical URL
- https://evemisslab.com/ai/claims/CLM-2026-0204/
- 快照
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-58e716495670- 來源歷程
source- EveMissLab research collection: AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (真本體論14)
extracted_by- Splice (Claude Code), reading the open-source release's own manifests, locks and pooled outputs, and the hashes of the internal drafts
extracted_at- 2026-10-13
generator- tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary- status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports