ClaimCLM-2026-0204v0.1

H4 — Conventional secret-scanning statistics undercount semantic privacy leakage

Conventional secret-scanning statistics undercount semantic privacy leakage.

Research status: EXPERIMENTAL being tested experimentally
Evidence level: E1 Internal observation
Data basis: THEORY Theoretical reasoning only; no measurement.
Version: 0.1
Updated: 2026-10-13
Created: 2026-09-21
Domain: Privacy
Program: PRG-2026-0201 AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (APBSC)
Authors: Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI collaborators: Splice (Claude Code, Anthropic) — Phase II protocols, runners, audits, reports and the integrated edition

Recorded fields

falsification_conditions: Falsified if semantic classes add little beyond literal secret matches. Phase II: the individual-era rule found twice as many repositories with a high warning as the pattern-heavy organization-era rule — suggestive, not a test against real secret scanners.
tags: hypothesis (H)
integrated edition appendix A

Source	Relation	Target	Status	ID
`THY-2026-0204` From secret scanning to semantic privacy	`contains`	`CLM-2026-0204` H4 — Conventional secret-scanning statistics undercount semantic privacy leakage	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0515`
`RST-2026-0204` Individual-era rule finds about twice the high-warning repositories of the organization-era rule (34 vs 17 of 400)	`supports`	`CLM-2026-0204` H4 — Conventional secret-scanning statistics undercount semantic privacy leakage	`ACTIVE`	`REL-2026-0616`

Canonical URL

Machine-readable

Snapshot

AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-58e716495670

Provenance

source: EveMissLab research collection: AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (真本體論14)
extracted_by: Splice (Claude Code), reading the open-source release's own manifests, locks and pooled outputs, and the hashes of the internal drafts
extracted_at: 2026-10-13
generator: tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary: status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports