EVEMISSLAB
English

理論THY-2026-0108v0.1

高歧義成果的有型別、有版本品質本體

在寫任何題目之前,品質必須先是有型別的空間 Q[領域、任務、情境、受眾] = Q_core ⊕ Q_domain ⊕ Q_task,附帶構念之間依賴與衝突的構念圖,以及測量條目化管線 任務 → 構念 → 指標 → 題目 → 觀測 → 潛在估計。任何指標(BLEU、CLIPScore、美學模型分數)都只是空間的一個投影;構念效度閘(覆蓋、區辨效度、收斂證據、情境穩定)防止「精準地量錯東西」;本體是開放的——可從殘餘錯誤新增構念——但每次修訂都是一個版本,而多模態品質不是各模態分數的平均。

研究狀態
PRELIMINARY 已有初步的形式化或觀察
證據等級
E0 僅有概念
資料基礎
THEORY 純理論推理,沒有量測。
版本
0.1
更新
2026-09-02
建立
2026-09-02
領域
Evaluation
計畫
PRG-2026-0101 智能的物理計量(IPM)
作者
Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI 協作
Aletheia (GPT-5.6 Sol, OpenAI ChatGPT)

定義

definitions
  • Core Q_core = (fidelity, coherence, completeness, robustness, usefulness, verifiability); domain schemas for text, image, music, story, design; multimodal coupling dimensions.
  • Quality construct graph G_Q = (V_Q, E_Q); construct validity gate G_C; open ontology Q_{t+1} = Q_t ∪ {new construct} under versioning.
  • High-ambiguity quality object 𝔔_HA = (Q_schema, G_Q, Q_F, Q_S, θ̂_H, Σ_H, D_R, B_Q, Version_Q).

前提

assumptions
  • Subjective ≠ unstructured: large populations reliably detect structural failures even in creative artifacts.

主張

claims
  • HighAmbiguity ≠ Unmeasurable; Construct ≠ Indicator ≠ Item ≠ Metric; Reliability ≠ Validity.
  • Fluency ≠ Factuality; Coherence ≠ Correctness; TechnicalQuality ≠ AestheticQuality; PromptSimilarity ≠ ImageQuality; Novelty ≠ Creativity; AestheticAppeal ≠ Usability.
  • MultimodalQuality ≠ Mean(ModalityScores); CrossDomainComparison ⇒ SharedConstructBasis; OntologyRevision ⇒ Versioning; PreciseMeasurement ≠ CorrectConstructSelection.

形式化

formalization
  • Quality fiber view Q = ∪_x Q_x over x = (d, τ, c, a); cross-task projection Π_{x→y} only over shared constructs.
  • Creativity as a region (novelty, appropriateness, value, surprise, coherence), not novelty × usefulness.

預測

predictions
  • Benchmarks whose quality ontology drifts without versioning will produce longitudinal comparisons that are silently invalid.

證偽/失敗條件

falsification_conditions
  • If a flat, unversioned checklist explains rater residuals and new failure modes as well as the typed construct graph, the ontology machinery is unnecessary.

已知限制

known_limitations
  • Schema proposals only; no domain ontology has been validated across populations.

關係

來源關係目標狀態ID
THY-2026-0108 高歧義成果的有型別、有版本品質本體extendsTHY-2026-0107 二元殘餘品質測量(IBQF/BRQM)ACTIVEREL-2026-0373
RES-2026-0102 品質線——不叫人打分數也能量成果品質developsTHY-2026-0108 高歧義成果的有型別、有版本品質本體ACTIVEREL-2026-0365
THY-2026-0109 鷹架能力紀錄:SSR、SDR、SCM 與消融階梯extendsTHY-2026-0108 高歧義成果的有型別、有版本品質本體ACTIVEREL-2026-0376
THY-2026-0110 canonical intelligence event、Pareto 比較與不過早純量化extendsTHY-2026-0108 高歧義成果的有型別、有版本品質本體ACTIVEREL-2026-0379
PAP-2026-0108 自然語言、圖像與創意如何被量?:高歧義成果的結構化品質空間formalizesTHY-2026-0108 高歧義成果的有型別、有版本品質本體ACTIVEREL-2026-0420

歷史與來源歷程

Canonical URL
https://evemisslab.com/ai/theory/THY-2026-0108/
機器可讀
/ai/theory/THY-2026-0108/index.json
快照
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45
來源歷程
source
EveMissLab research collection: Intelligence Physical Metrology (真本體論13)
extracted_by
Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each package's own reports
extracted_at
2026-09-11
generator
tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary
status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports