理論THY-2026-0006v0.1
AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界
每一次 canonical knowledge 的改動都必須通過一個強制的認識論交易邊界，綁定 claim、evidence、provenance、有效時間與觀察時間、expected version、認識論算子、驗證政策、權限、依賴與 refresh policy：Propose → Verify → Authorize → CompareAndCommit → BindDependencies → Audit。零件都不新（truth maintenance、transaction logic、PROV、bitemporal state、PDP/PEP）；假說是這個 tuple 在 canonical write 邊界上是強制的——一個類 reference-monitor 的認識論邊界，而非已證明 tamperproof 的 monitor。
主張
claims- Architectural elevation = same semantic capability + smaller policy-scattering surface + mandatory canonical boundary; not computational uniqueness.
- When accepted knowledge has operational consequences, epistemic governance may deserve the architectural status that transaction boundaries have in databases.
預測
predictions- Policy sites and rule placements scale O(NR) when scattered versus O(R) under one gate; a new caller does not require new policy placement.
- Internal consistency ≠ authenticity: without an external trust anchor a coherent full-DB forgery passes internal audit.
證偽／失敗條件
falsification_conditions- Bypass is easy under accidental or adversarial pressure — then ECT is merely a convenient API.
- Hostile same-process code or a full DB writer defeats local controls (accepted: tamperproofness is not claimed).
已知限制
known_limitations- Primitive, transaction, provenance, versioning, belief-revision and temporal novelty are weak or not claimed (R3 novelty verdict); OS privilege isolation, signer compromise and cross-resource ACID are not measured (R6).
證據
| 來源 | 關係 | 目標 | 狀態 | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EXP-2026-0004 R3——認識論 commit 交易 vs 分散式與集中式應用 gate | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0129 |
RST-2026-0003 R3：AER-ECT ≈ 集中式應用 gate | contradicts | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0136 |
EXP-2026-0005 R4——政策變異面：分散治理 vs 單一強制邊界 | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0139 |
EXP-2026-0006 R5——完全中介與繞過抗性 | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0144 |
RST-2026-0004 R5 十情境統計 | supports | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0148 |
EXP-2026-0007 R6——外部信任 anchor、程序分離 writer、adapter 一致性 | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0151 |
RST-2026-0005 R6：外部 anchor 下偽造偵測翻轉 | supports | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0155 |
關係
| 來源 | 關係 | 目標 | 狀態 | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
RES-2026-0003 認識論治理能不能活過實作？AER-0 架構比較 | develops | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0016 |
SYS-2026-0001 AER-0——自適應認識 runtime MVP | implements | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0067 |
BEN-2026-0002 AER-0 架構比較套件（R1–R6） | evaluates | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0089 |
EXP-2026-0004 R3——認識論 commit 交易 vs 分散式與集中式應用 gate | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0129 |
RST-2026-0003 R3：AER-ECT ≈ 集中式應用 gate | contradicts | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0136 |
EXP-2026-0005 R4——政策變異面：分散治理 vs 單一強制邊界 | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0139 |
EXP-2026-0006 R5——完全中介與繞過抗性 | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0144 |
RST-2026-0004 R5 十情境統計 | supports | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0148 |
EXP-2026-0007 R6——外部信任 anchor、程序分離 writer、adapter 一致性 | tests | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0151 |
RST-2026-0005 R6：外部 anchor 下偽造偵測翻轉 | supports | THY-2026-0006 AER-ECT：強制的認識論 commit 交易邊界 | ACTIVE | REL-2026-0155 |
歷史與來源歷程
- Canonical URL
- https://evemisslab.com/ai/theory/THY-2026-0006/
- 快照
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-fe85b9694a45- 來源歷程
source- EveMissLab research collection: Adaptive Epistemic Systems (真本體論13)
extracted_by- Splice (Claude Code), reading the canonical UTF-8 sources and each lab's own result reports
extracted_at- 2026-09-11
generator- tools/extract_aes/extract.py
claim_boundary- status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports