EVEMISSLAB

ResearchRES-2026-0201v0.1

Why passing checks does not close the publication boundary

Papers 00–05. The five-state information chain (observed → authorized → persisted → published → externally obtainable), the green-light fallacy (V₁ ∧ … ∧ Vₙ = PASS ⇏ G), agent context as an egress surface with nine context classes, recoverability R0–R4 beyond literal secret matching, and two hypotheses about scale: organizational propagation of shared agent context, and an AI build–attack asymmetry.

Research status
STABLE the current conclusions are relatively stable
Evidence level
E1 Internal observation
Version
0.1
Updated
2026-10-13
Created
2026-09-21
Domain
Privacy
Program
PRG-2026-0201 AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (APBSC)
Authors
Neo.K (EveMissLab)
AI collaborators
AI collaboration recorded for the series; the collaborator is not named in the drafts, Splice (Claude Code, Anthropic) — Phase II protocols, runners, audits, reports and the integrated edition

Relations

SourceRelationTargetStatusID
RES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundarybelongs_toPRG-2026-0201 AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (APBSC)ACTIVEREL-2026-0501
RES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundarydevelopsTHY-2026-0201 Publication-boundary closure — the integrated frameworkACTIVEREL-2026-0504
RES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundarydevelopsTHY-2026-0202 The green-light fallacyACTIVEREL-2026-0505
RES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundarydevelopsTHY-2026-0203 Agent context as an egress surfaceACTIVEREL-2026-0506
RES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundarydevelopsTHY-2026-0204 From secret scanning to semantic privacyACTIVEREL-2026-0507
RES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundarydevelopsTHY-2026-0205 Organizational propagation of agent context (hypothesis)ACTIVEREL-2026-0508
RES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundarydevelopsTHY-2026-0206 AI build–attack asymmetry (hypothesis)ACTIVEREL-2026-0509
PAP-2026-0201 Paper 00 — Agentic publication boundary and security closure: the integrated frameworkreportsRES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundaryACTIVEREL-2026-0526
PAP-2026-0202 Paper 01 — The green-light fallacy: when agent verification succeeds and the real postcondition does notreportsRES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundaryACTIVEREL-2026-0528
PAP-2026-0203 Paper 02 — Agent context as an egress surfacereportsRES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundaryACTIVEREL-2026-0530
PAP-2026-0204 Paper 03 — From secret scanning to semantic privacyreportsRES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundaryACTIVEREL-2026-0532
PAP-2026-0205 Paper 04 — Organizational agent context propagationreportsRES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundaryACTIVEREL-2026-0534
PAP-2026-0206 Paper 05 — AI build–attack asymmetryreportsRES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundaryACTIVEREL-2026-0536
PAP-2026-0211 AI Agents and the Public Boundary — the APBSC integrated public edition v1.0reportsRES-2026-0201 Why passing checks does not close the publication boundaryACTIVEREL-2026-0544

History and provenance

Canonical URL
https://evemisslab.com/ai/research/RES-2026-0201/
Machine-readable
/ai/research/RES-2026-0201/index.json
Snapshot
AI-SNAPSHOT-v0.1-58e716495670
Provenance
source
EveMissLab research collection: AI Agent Publication Boundary and Security Closure (真本體論14)
extracted_by
Splice (Claude Code), reading the open-source release's own manifests, locks and pooled outputs, and the hashes of the internal drafts
extracted_at
2026-10-13
generator
tools/extract_all.py
claim_boundary
status, evidence level and result type follow the source artifact's own stated claim boundary; nothing is upgraded beyond what the report supports